Why couldnt voldemort kill harry potter

Minerva McGonagall could and should have said something. After all, she already expressed doubt about leaving Harry with the Dursleys. At the very least, maybe she could have offered to be the one to talk to the Dursleys. She also could have checked up on Harry Potter every once in a while or something. Yeah, I agree that having Mrs. If it was just Mrs. Figg, what would she have done?

By the time she managed to call for help, it might be too late for Potter. Why is it boring? Is it really boring? Rowling, has a very boring beginning? The pace also seemed quiet slow since it took a bit of time before things really started happening such as Harry going to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry and learning a variety of spells. But things started to get more interesting and fun especially when we got to Hogwarts and got to see more of the magical and fantasy aspects of the story.

So what about you? What do you think about this? Feel free and welcome to share your thoughts and opinions by reblogging this post or by leaving a comment below. The following is my response to this comment from this post :.

You know, if Voldemort actually used his brains, then he would have succeeded in capturing Harry and maybe he would have succeeded in killing him as well.

What should he have done instead? Why not? It sounds rather contrived, as if this only happened just so Harry could find out about the stone. I mean, what if someone else had been tasked to fetch the stone? Not only does he know a lot of people, there are also plenty who are loyal to him and would gladly aid him.

Would Harry still be able to find out about it? Feel free to share your thoughts and opinions by reblogging this post or by leaving a comment below. What about the other students there especially those from Ravenclaw house? Rowling, was really actually a werewolf? Still, you'd think after each failed attempt, he'd switch things up and maybe try to kill Harry earlier in the year.

The weak-minded Quirrell finds the floating-through-space essence of Voldemort and wants to learn more, but the Dark Lord just sees an opportunity to regain some semblance of a human form, along with searching for the Philosopher's Stone to gain immortality.

It's always about living forever with this guy. It's a nifty trick until young Harry destroys Quirrell's body with the touch of his hand as the love of his mother courses through him , and Voldemort escapes.

What we don't understand is why Voldemort didn't just find another body to possess. It would have given the Dark Lord a more comfortable existence before he reanimated himself.

Instead, Voldemort decides to abandon that idea and use a rudimentary body as a go-between. He then comes up with a potion that will bring him back into the world fully formed. Like we said, possession seems a better temporary choice, but if he wants to take the rudimentary body route, why not just do that from the start?

Get that potion cooking with the unicorn blood, Nagini's snake venom, and Harry's blood -- and be the Dark Lord a lot sooner. Apparently, Voldie wants to do things the hard way. All of this begs the real question, which is: why does it take Voldemort 10 years to finally resurface? We know the deal: after killing James and Lily Potter, his Killing Curse attempt to murder the 1-year-old Harry rebounds and obliterates his corporeal body, further splintering his soul and sending whatever spectral form is left off to Albania to hide.

Now while Voldemort wasn't able to get to Harry right away because he was protected under the Dursleys' enchantment bubble, he should have come back in one of those other forms we just described above, wreaking havoc while working furiously on a plan to get his body back.

It seems the Dark Lord's rage and revenge would overcome his humiliation of being bested by toddler much sooner than it did. This scenario really doesn't make much sense, even if it is cool to watch in The Chamber of Secrets. Lucius Malfoy eventually obtains the diary and slips it to Ginny Weasley in hopes of it opening the Chamber once again, which it does. What we are scratching our heads over is the fact the teenage Tom, fed by little Ginny's fears that she writes in the diary, grows stronger and eventually materializes.

If she died, he'd be whole again. Doesn't this defeat Voldemort's whole purpose of finding a way to return in his adult body? Had he succeeded, then You Know Who would have had to go through his whole life again. That seems highly unlikely. As the Transfiguration professor at Hogwarts, Albus Dumbledore met a young Tom at an orphanage to recruit him as the kid had no idea he was half wizard. Naturally, Tom was already a little evil then, and Dumbledore was alarmed by it, reprimanding the boy, but he also thought proper wizard training would help Tom control the bad impulses.

That was Dumbledore's first mistake. The problem we have is later, when Tom is at Hogwarts and displays his clearly brilliant but malevolent intellect. Dumbledore turns a seemingly blind eye towards the lad.

The key to dealing with a difficult journey is the right travel companion. Voldemort unknowingly made it so that Harry would always survive any of their encounters. As long as Voldemort himself survived, so would Harry. Confusing, right? Yet it makes perfect sense that such a thing would happen. Eventually, Harry defeated Voldemort once and for all. Voldemort again tried to kill Harry, not having learned his lesson the first time, and the curse rebounded on the Dark Lord himself due to the Elder Wand refusing to kill its true master.

Dumbledore, realizing that the craving for power was his most dangerous weakness, turned down the post of Minister of Magic and stayed at Hogwarts his whole career.

Dumbledore avoided facing Grindelwald for as long as possible, afraid that he might learn that it was he, Dumbledore, who cast the spell that killed Ariana. Finally, he defeated Grindelwald and took the Elder Wand from him. He put it on, forgetting that the ring was now a Horcrux and thus cursed, thereby ruining his hand and causing his own eventual demise.

He says that he never could have united the Hallows because he took the Cloak out of idle curiosity and the Stone for selfish reasons, wishing to disturb the peaceful dead.